« August 2001 | Main | October 2001 »
For those of you not familiar with the Tragedy of the Commons, I take the liberty of copying McFadden's explanation:
Immigrants to New England in the 17th century formed villages in which they had privately owned homesteads and gardens, but they also set aside community-owned pastures, called commons, where all of the villagers' livestock could graze. Settlers had an incentive to avoid overuse of their private lands, so they would remain productive in the future. However, this self-interested stewardship of private lands did not extend to the commons. As a result, the commons were overgrazed and degenerated to the point that they were no longer able to support the villagers' cattle. This failure of private incentives to provide adequate maintenance of public resources is known to economists as "the tragedy of the commons."
McFadden goes on to discuss various options for how content and service providers are going to get paid enough to induce them to put quality content online. The arguments against the four alternatives he lays out (ads, paid via ISP, paid via monopoly, paid via PBS style organization) are solid. But just when you expect an "aha moment" he copes out with this:
The solutions that resolve the problem of the digital commons are likely to be ingenious ways to collect money from consumers with little noticeable pain, and these should facilitate the operation of the Internet as a market for goods and services. Just don't expect it to be free.
So, is this a fifth model - user pays via micropayments - that he has not fully analyzed, or is it a hope that someone will come up with a way of making the first four models work? An insightful analysis of the value of micropayment models is much needed to round this out.
And of course it goes without saying that my access to his article was made possible by the fine people at IBM who had banners all over the pages I read.
This InfoWorld article gives a good overview of the announcement of Liberty by Sun and its partners. It also makes the obvious conclusion that this is still largely vaporware.
While it is still too early to tell what will come of these "universal log-on" services, it is important for us to watch this area develop. The proliferation of log-on schemes and user ID/password combinations is one hindrance to web usability that would be nice to do away with. Authenticated surfing may not please privacy advocates, but it should make content sites happy if they can start offering the bulk of currently free content as "free when authenticated" in the future. A lot of the "1-1 Marketing" hyperbole comes closer to reality when you can recognize people and their associated profiles on each visit. If Passport and/or Liberty succeed, I predict that we won't see ANY content sites that offer more than headlines without authentication.
IBM's developerWorks has a good article on how to respond to usability complaints called
The cranky user: What's with the attitude? If you have to deal with feedback on your site, this is worth a review. (I'm tempted to see how Peter "Cranky User" Seebach would respond to some harsh words about this article, but I couldn't think of much to complain about!)
Case in point is the current move to limit personal freedoms, particularly on the Internet. Talk of Carnivore and Echelon - once considered urban legends - is now common and often positive. New legislation looks at enhancing the amount of information officials can collect without warrants and talk of national "identity" cards is being raised in the US and Great Britain.
Add to this biometric surveillance and you have the makings of a very dangerous loss of freedom of movement - online and off.
My last post was made on September 11th at 9:14 am. It's been hard to find a context that makes my usual commentary relevant since then. But I'm ready now. Hopefully you are as well.
While I chose to respond to the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US with silence, others in the weblog community turned weblogging into a vital source of voices outside the mainstream media.
This CNET article provides some insights into the use of Weblogs since September 11 as did Wired News.
In the days that followed the attacks, I used the following quote to sign off on my e-mail correspondence.
"History is merely a list of surprises.
It can only prepare us to be surprised yet again."
- Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
Take for example the E-mail Sign Up Page you get at KraftCanada.com after clicking on the "Recipes by E-Mail" link.
My guess is that someone at Kraft thought that e-mailing recipes full of Kraft products would be a good way to increase use in the kind of consumers that care enough about Kraft to visit there web site. Then someone else suggested make the page "interactive" by collecting information on my particular interests and the kind of Kraft products I use.
Probably the next person to look at the page said something like "why don't we make this the core of our integrated offline/online CRM initiative." At that point they added a lot of demographic and geographic questions.
So now when a consumer clicks to get recipes by e-mail, they have to answer over 30 questions on their household and shopping habits. To make matters worse, the form requires that you tell them if you have kids at home, what your age is, whether you are female or male, and (sin of sins) what your street address is!
So, instead of making consumers value them and their products for the many new ideas they email each week, Kraft probably alienates 90% of the people who attempt to sign up. A wasted opportunity.
Compare this to the P&G run S Mag sign-up (you need to click on the "subscribe" link near the top).
This editorial called "The Bottom Line on E-Commerce" in Interactive Week makes two good points about Bricks and Clicks e-commerce.
1. E-Commerce is starting to become profitable for those doing it right. Examples include 1-800-Flowers.com, Ameritrade, eBay, Expedia, Homestore.com, Monster.com, Northwest Airlines, Office Depot, Priceline.com, Register.com, Travelocity.com and United Parcel Service.
2. Profits from online ventures may not be the best way of looking at online success for Brick and Click retailers since e-commerce also has positive and in many cases measurable impact on offline sales and service costs.
Given the ability for any Tom, Dick or Andy to put up a web site sure to irritate those currently in power, it can only be assumed that political dissent in one form or another will be around for awhile.
The extra great thing about political satire on the web is all the exposure one's opinions get once the "viral aspect kicks in" (I keep hearing people saying that.)
This extremely disturbing article in the Guardian points out that marketing can actually create false memories in consumers. Consumers "remember" using products that didn't previously exist or having other childhood experiences because of advertising or product branding. For example, consumers report drinking bottles of Stewart's root beer in childhood when it's only been bottled for the last ten years. The bottles are marketed as "original", "old fashioned" and "Since 1927."
Scary quote:
"This brings forth ethical considerations. Is it OK for marketers to knowingly manipulate consumers' past?
"On one hand, the alteration will occur whether or not that was the intent of the marketer given the reconstructive nature of recall.
On the other hand, there are ways in which the marketer can enhance the likelihood consumer memories will be consistent with their advertising messages. At the very least, consumers ought to be aware of that power."
Then again, maybe this isn't news. I vaguely remember reading this same article when I was young. Someone please reassure me that "Joe Louis" existed before 1975!
Jakob offers some interesting real world experiences on running a text ad on Google. I think the analysis is spot on, suggesting that aligning the ads goal with the user's goal in visiting the page make the ad more effective. I've been talking about building context into online marketing for a while now and this is a great example.
One exception I take is that Nielsen feels this is only effective on search engine results pages. I think context will improve an ad on any page on any site, and it will be of particular value on pages that people go to for help. If I'm looking for information on getting stains out of clothes and see a link to download the Tide Stain Detective on my PDA so I'll always have this information on my finger tips, that ad is in context and should out-perform generic "run of site" ads.
I'd also suggest that the Tide Stain Detective download would also do well to advertise on Palm app download pages. The last place I would go would be a cooking page based on the assumption that whoever is cooking is also doing the laundry and will therefore be interested. This is weak context.
Widely seen as a pioneer of the Internet in Canada, Ken has tirelessly promoted the Net as a significant force in business and culture.
Ken conceived and oversaw Sony Music Canada's early online initiatives. From their first site in 1995, Ken's team built a global web presence for 25 Canadian artists, by pioneering viral and e-mail marketing, rich media, and community building long before they had become buzzwords.
In 1996 he co-founded (AIMS) where as President he helped it become Canada's largest organization for Internet decision-makers. In 1997 he co-authored the online portion of the Canadian Marketing Association's Code of Ethics.
Ken's volunteer work was recognized in 2002 when he was named a finalist for "Volunteer of the Year" at the Canadian New Media Awards.
More recently, Ken developed the curriculum and taught the 14-week CMA's Certificate in E-marketing program.
Today, he is VP, Marketing & Product Management for Tucows and a contributor to One Degree, Canada's leading web site for Internet marketing professionals.
Ken received his degree in Mathematics from the University of Waterloo and lives outside Toronto with his wife, parenting expert Alyson Schafer, and their two children.
Gary Hamel: The Future of Management
I found this very inspiring. We're working through a lot of these issues at Tucows and a few of us have now read this book. Really thought provoking and more pragmatic than I was expecting.
James Surowiecki: The Wisdom of Crowds
I can't believe how long it too me to get to this "must read" for the social media cognoscenti but it didn't disappoint.
Walter Isaacson: Einstein
Isaacson provides a comprehensive study of the great man, intertwining his personal and scientific lives effortlessly.
Chip & Dan Heath: Made to Stick
A fantastic resource for anyone who needs to clearly communicate anything. Probably my top business book of 2007. A must read.
Steven Pinker: The Stuff of Thought
Getting through the grammar lessons in the early chapters was a bit of a challenge but the sections on why we swear where absolutely worth it!
Nassim Nicholas Taleb: The Black Swan
While Taleb's ideas are VERY important I have a hard time recommending the book to the average reader as it does delve pretty heavily into statistical and probabilistic thinking at times. If you don't mind a bit of hard work in the later chapters this will reward with some great insights into how much we are ruled by randomness.
Khaled Hosseini: A Thousand Splendid Suns
The history of Kabul Afghanistan disguised as the harrowing stories of two women as they deal with oppression and injustice while finding time to love and learn.
William Gibson: Spook Country
I enjoyed this far more than I was expecting. I tried Neuromancer ages ago and couldn't get into it, but Spook Country was very much a page turner - heavy on plot, set in a futuristic "near past" (2006). Highly recommended.
J.D. Salinger: The Catcher in the Rye
Getting around to reading classics I should have read much earlier in life is a big goal for 2008. Finally meeting Holden Caufield was a great start.
You can see why the book was radical in its time - in content and style, but it seems pretty darn quaint these days. Is it still banned anywhere?
Cormac Mccarthy: All the Pretty Horses
A cowboy gothic starting and ending with a funeral. In between we get minimalist dialogue, pages of apocalyptic odes to equines and Mexican desert landscapes. Brilliant.
Cormac McCarthy: The Road
Incredibly powerful - probably one of my all-time favourite books despite the relentless bleakness.
Harper Lee: To Kill a Mockingbird
Just wonderful. I've seen the movie many times but reading the book was a revelation.